Marijnissen’s Diary of In-Between might be the emotional glue of the exhibition. Her small Polaroids imperfect, tactile, almost vulnerable in scale read like whispered notes to herself. Sixteen years of moving between Belgium and Pakistan, of forming chosen family, of navigating motherhood and loss, all distilled into fragments.
There’s a trace of Nan Goldin’s diaristic honesty there, yes, but Marijnissen’s gaze feels softer. Observational, but not detached. The Polaroid format itself resists polish. It resists spectacle. It insists on presence.
What moved me most about the exhibition, though, wasn’t any single body of work. It was the way they belonged together.
Four different identities. Four different techniques. Four very different stages of life. Yet nothing felt misplaced. Hassan’s softness would not survive in Arif’s archival austerity. Malika’s surreal tension would not exist in Wendy’s quiet diary. And yet in that space, they flowed.
That cohesion wasn’t accidental. Marijnissen and Abbas spoke about floor plans, mockups, long discussions across continents. The layering of wallpaper and stickers wasn’t decorative, it was conceptual. Images overlapping images. Stories sitting beside stories. Intimacy becoming structure.
That said, I’d be doing the show a disservice if I only celebrated it. There is a tension in the curatorial process worth sitting with rather than resolving. Marijnissen is a European photographer who chose Pakistan as a second home; Gondol is the son of workers the Pakistani industrial system displaced and then forgot. These are not the same relationship to place, to belonging, or to what “resistance” actually costs. And yet the curtain holds them in the same warm light. That is the exhibition’s bravest move, and its most unresolved one. Lucy Lippard, writing on the community-based practice, draws a distinction between solidarity and proximity: being in the same room is not the same as having the same stakes (Lippard, The Lure of the Local, 1997). The curatorial instinct here beautifully executed, is to find harmony. But in finding it so cleanly, it may have absorbed the friction the makes Gondol’s work most urgent. Hal Foster has written about the “archival impulse” in contemporary practice, the risk that gestures of preservation and collection become aestheticized, softening the political force of the material they hold (Foster, “An Archival Impulse”, October 2004).
And underneath all of this is something urgent: the desire to build a platform for documentary photography in Pakistan that values depth over trend. A fellowship. An archive. An institute. A place where young photographers can commit to long-term storytelling without being told that only commercial work matters.
In a country where people still sit on panels and ask, “Is photography art?”, this exhibition doesn’t bother arguing. It simply demonstrates. It shows what happens when photographers are honest with their form, when they photograph because they must, not because it sells.
As someone who is deeply drawn to portraiture, to the idea that no two faces, no two identities are ever the same, I saw this show as a portrait in itself. A portrait of four ways of seeing. Four ways of resisting. Not loudly. Not theatrically. But persistently.
Intimate Resistance doesn’t shout. It doesn’t demand. It stays with you quietly. And maybe that is its greatest strength. Because sometimes resistance isn’t a raised fist. Sometimes it’s choosing to keep looking.
‘Intimate Resistance’, a group show held at The VASL Gallery, Karachi, on the 25th of November 2025, featuring works from Wendy Marijnissen, Malika Abbas, Arif Mahmood & Hassan Gondal. Co-curated by Wendy Marijnissen and Malika Abbas.
Title Image: Untitled, Wendy Marijnissen, digital photograph, 2025
There are no comments